Nevada Judge Bridget Robb Faces Stalking Allegations from Attorney

Nevada’s legal community is reeling as a respected family court judge faces serious accusations that could end a decades-long career.

Nevada Family Court Judge Bridget Robb, 63, announced her retirement effective February 6 after being accused of stalking Kelci Binau, a 37-year-old gaming and administrative law attorney. Earlier this month, Binau filed for a temporary protection order (TPO) against Robb in Reno Civil Court, which was granted by Judge Pierre Hascheff. A hearing for an extended protection order is scheduled for February 13 in Washoe County, while Robb has also withdrawn her candidacy for a general jurisdiction seat on the Washoe District Court.

Judge Robb's Career and Accusations Surface

The issue has sparked debate over personal conduct and public trust in the judiciary. While Robb has served honorably since passing the Nevada bar in 1987, the allegations paint a troubling picture. Appointed to the Second Judicial District Court in 2006 by former Gov. Kenny Guinn, her record includes work on Supreme Court task forces—yet now, her legacy risks being overshadowed.

Binau, who practices at McDonald Carano in Reno, alleged in court documents that Robb engaged in “willful, repeated” behavior starting in May 2024. News 4 reported claims of extensive incidents, including doorbell footage at residences and workplaces. This isn’t just a personal spat—it raises questions about boundaries when legal professionals live and work in close proximity, as both are Washoe County residents and State Bar members, as Daily Mail reports.

Police investigations in late 2025 added weight to the claims, with detectives spotting Robb driving near a fitness studio Binau frequents. When interviewed at her home on January 7, Robb reportedly admitted to actions that could be seen as obsessive. News 4 noted bodycam footage captured her explanation, which tied her behavior to coping with a past personal connection—though details remain murky.

Legal Proceedings and Robb's Response

The temporary protection order, in place for up to 45 days, doesn’t imply guilt but aims to shield Binau until the February 13 hearing. At that session, both women will present their cases, and Judge Hascheff will decide if an extended order—lasting up to two years—is warranted. This isn’t a verdict, but the stakes couldn’t be higher for Robb’s reputation.

Robb’s decision to step down speaks volumes, especially after being removed from cases and committees following the TPO. “After careful consideration, I have made the decision to retire from my position as a Judge in the Second Judicial District Court for Washoe County, effective February 6,” she stated. Her words suggest a desire to limit damage, but they don’t address the core accusations.

“Serving the people of Washoe County has been an honor and a responsibility I have taken seriously throughout my time on the bench,” Robb added. That’s a noble sentiment, but it’s hard to reconcile with allegations of such invasive behavior. If true, this isn’t just a personal failing—it erodes trust in a system meant to uphold fairness.

Public Trust and Judicial Integrity

The timing of Robb’s retirement, just before the hearing, raises eyebrows. Was this a strategic move to avoid further scrutiny, or a genuine act of contrition? Either way, her withdrawal from the race for Department 10 shows the allegations have derailed her ambitions.

Let’s be clear: the judiciary must be above reproach, especially in an era where public faith in institutions is already shaky. When a judge, tasked with protecting families in court, is accused of overstepping personal boundaries, it fuels cynicism. This isn’t about progressive agendas—it’s about accountability for those in power.

Binau’s safety and privacy are paramount, and the legal process must play out without interference. Yet, the lack of comment from both parties’ attorneys, as reported by the Daily Mail, leaves the public guessing. Transparency matters, especially when the courthouse and Binau’s office sit on the same block—a stark reminder of how small communities amplify personal conflicts.

Broader Implications for Nevada Courts

Robb’s career—spanning commercial litigation to family law—deserves acknowledgment, but past achievements don’t excuse present missteps. If the February 13 hearing confirms the allegations, it could set a precedent for how Nevada handles judicial misconduct. The system must protect victims while ensuring due process, no exceptions.

This case also highlights the pressure on legal professionals in tight-knit regions like Washoe County. When personal and professional lines blur, as they may have here, the fallout can be devastating. It’s a cautionary tale for anyone in a position of authority.

Ultimately, the focus should remain on facts, not speculation, as the hearing approaches. Robb’s retirement may close one chapter, but the extended protection order decision will shape how this story is remembered. Nevada’s courts, and the public they serve, deserve nothing less than clarity and justice.