Todd Blanche's AG confirmation hits a wall — and it's not just Democrats causing the trouble

 July 31, 2026

Sen. Alex Padilla is calling acting Attorney General Todd Blanche "disqualifying" over his ties to President Trump, but the real threat to Blanche's confirmation comes from inside the Republican caucus.

Padilla, a California Democrat, appeared on MSNBC's "The Weeknight" on Thursday and laid out what he called the core problem with Blanche's nomination: the acting attorney general still serves as Trump's personal lawyer. That dual role, Padilla argued, makes Blanche unfit for the job. But while Democrats were always going to oppose the pick, two Republican senators are now holding up the vote over an entirely different set of concerns, ones the White House has so far failed to resolve.

The confirmation fight over Blanche has exposed fractures on the right that go beyond Democratic talking points. Republican Sens. John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina are demanding written guarantees from the Justice Department on a controversial Trump-IRS settlement before they will cast a vote. With the Senate Judiciary Committee split 11-10 along party lines after the death of Sen. Lindsey Graham, a single Republican defection sinks the nomination. Two holdouts make the math impossible.

Padilla frames Blanche as Trump's personal lawyer, not the nation's

Padilla's broadside against Blanche centered on a statement the acting attorney general made during his committee hearing. As Padilla told MSNBC:

"He's not here to be the Attorney General for the people of the United States of America. He said he's here to be the attorney general for the president, the president's agenda, the president's political agenda, the political agenda of vindictiveness and retribution for his perceived political enemies. He was Donald Trump's personal attorney before, and he remains that, as far as I can tell. So that is what's ultimately disqualifying."

Padilla urged Republican colleagues to "really reflect" before casting their votes. He also signaled that Democrats plan to use the confirmation battle as campaign material heading into November, tying Blanche to broader cost-of-living arguments.

"It's now closer to November, we're reminding people of the increased cost they're paying for housing, gas, health care and more because of Donald Trump," Padilla said. He added that if Democrats retake the congressional majority, "we're going to have some people testifying under oath."

That kind of rhetoric is standard midterm positioning from the minority party. But the more immediate problem for Blanche has nothing to do with Democratic opposition, it comes from his own side.

Cornyn and Tillis forced the committee to cancel its vote

The Senate Judiciary Committee canceled a scheduled confirmation vote for Blanche less than 24 hours before it was set to take place. The reason: Cornyn and Tillis refused to advance the nomination without written modifications to an IRS settlement deal between the government and Trump's family.

At the center of the dispute is a nearly $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization fund" created as part of that settlement, along with an audit immunity clause that would shield Trump from future IRS scrutiny. Both provisions drew criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike during Blanche's hearing. The administration had a chance to resolve the impasse by providing written proposals modifying the settlement language, and it missed a 4 p.m. Wednesday deadline to deliver them.

Cornyn has not been subtle about his frustration. "They know what they need to do, but they simply refuse to do it," he told reporters. In a separate statement, he added: "We don't need well-wishes or impressions. We need concrete confirmation of what he testified to."

The White House's failure to meet the deadline forced Committee Chair Chuck Grassley to postpone the markup. A committee spokesperson said work continues "to secure sufficient support" and called Blanche "highly qualified for the job."

This is not the first time the administration has faced pushback from its own party on personnel decisions. Earlier this year, three Republican senators sided with Democrats in a failed attempt to block Bill Pulte from serving as acting intelligence chief.

Blanche faced skeptical Republicans at his own hearing

The confirmation hearing itself was rough for Blanche. Republican senators pressed him on both the anti-weaponization fund and the tax immunity deal, while Democrats used the occasion to attack the broader state of the Justice Department.

Democratic Sen. Chris Coons told Blanche directly: "You're in charge of a Department of Justice I don't recognize, prosecuting the president's political enemies, firing rank and file prosecutors and FBI agents." Cornyn, for his part, zeroed in on whether Trump had formally agreed in writing to abandon the weaponization fund. "Just to be clear, the president of the United States, who's a plaintiff in this lawsuit, has not agreed in writing to delete the weaponization fund," Cornyn said during the hearing.

The DOJ has been through considerable upheaval in recent months, with mass firings and resignations raising questions about institutional stability. Former AG Pam Bondi's departure left Blanche in the acting role, and the administration's inability to lock down his permanent confirmation adds another layer of uncertainty at the department.

Trump himself appeared unbothered by Cornyn's resistance. "All I can say is Todd Blanche is outstanding," the president said. "Maybe John Cornyn is upset with me because I didn't endorse him. I don't know what it is, but I haven't heard that there's a problem."

There is, plainly, a problem. Two senators from his own party have told the administration exactly what they need, and the administration has not provided it. The Senate's August recess looms, and every day without a deal pushes the confirmation further into political limbo.

Democrats smell an opening, but the real leverage sits on the right

Padilla's argument, that Blanche cannot separate his role as Trump's personal attorney from his duties as the nation's chief law enforcement officer, is a line Democrats will repeat through November regardless of what happens with the vote. It is a political argument dressed up as a constitutional one, and it will resonate with the Democratic base no matter how many times it is made.

But the argument that actually matters right now is the one Cornyn and Tillis are making. They are not questioning Blanche's loyalty to the president. They are questioning whether the Justice Department will put specific commitments in writing, commitments Blanche himself made under oath during his hearing. That is a straightforward demand for accountability, and it is one the administration has so far declined to meet.

The personnel churn across the administration has become a recurring theme. Trump recently tapped housing regulator Bill Pulte as acting intelligence chief, replacing Tulsi Gabbard in yet another high-profile staffing move. Each change invites fresh confirmation battles and fresh opportunities for both parties to grandstand.

Blanche's hearing, though, is different. His testimony before the Judiciary Committee was supposed to clear the path. Instead, it raised new questions that the DOJ has been unable or unwilling to answer on paper. With the committee evenly divided and no margin for error, the administration's failure to close the deal with its own senators is the kind of unforced error that turns a winnable fight into a prolonged one.

Meanwhile, the broader fight over accountability at the Justice Department continues. The administration has pushed an aggressive agenda on rooting out fraud and waste across the federal government, a goal that requires a confirmed attorney general with the authority and credibility to lead it.

Padilla wants voters to see Blanche as Trump's personal lawyer. Cornyn wants to see the DOJ's promises in writing. Only one of those demands can actually be satisfied, and so far, the administration has not managed even that.

When your own allies are the ones holding the door shut, blaming the other side does not get you through it.