Rep. Jim Jordan Seeks DOJ Action Against John Brennan Over Steele Dossier Claims

Heads up, fellow truth-seekers—House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan has just ignited a firestorm by referring former CIA Director John Brennan to the Department of Justice for potential criminal prosecution, as Breitbart reports.

At the heart of this seismic move are allegations that Brennan misled Congress about the dubious Steele dossier’s role in a crucial intelligence report that swayed public opinion.

For those of us fed up with the political class dodging accountability, this feels like a much-needed stand, though we must insist on ironclad evidence rather than just bold headlines.

Jordan’s Firm Stance Against Misconduct

Let’s dive into the details: Jim Jordan, as the head of the House Judiciary Committee, has officially called on the DOJ to investigate Brennan for what he alleges are deliberate falsehoods during sworn testimony.

The controversy stems from Brennan’s statements on May 11, 2023, before Jordan’s committee, where he reportedly minimized the impact of the now-discredited Steele dossier on vital intelligence conclusions.

If you’re not up to speed on this dossier, it’s the notorious report filled with unverified claims about Russian interference in the 2016 election—a narrative that’s since been widely questioned and largely debunked.

Timeline of the Intelligence Report Dispute

Take a step back to January 6, 2017, when the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) was unveiled, controversially claiming that Russia favored a particular candidate in the 2016 presidential race.

During testimony on May 23, 2017, Brennan maintained that the Steele dossier had no influence on the ICA’s findings—a position Jordan now disputes with evidence suggesting a different reality.

Isn’t it curious how these staunch denials keep surfacing, only to be contradicted by subsequent revelations? It’s almost as if certain figures in the intelligence world assume the public will forget or ignore the inconsistencies.

Heavy Allegations in Jordan’s DOJ Request

Jordan’s letter to the DOJ is unflinching, declaring, “We write to refer significant evidence that former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) John Brennan knowingly made false statements during his transcribed interview before the Committee on the Judiciary on May 11, 2023.”

That’s far from a trivial accusation—it’s a direct charge of lying under oath, a serious violation under U.S. law that could result in perjury charges if the claims are substantiated.

While we must uphold the principle of innocence until proven otherwise, it’s hard not to question whether this points to a broader pattern of elite figures expecting exemptions from the consequences that would swiftly befall everyday Americans.

Inconsistencies in Brennan’s Account Exposed

Adding to the weight of the matter, Jordan’s letter also states, “Brennan falsely denied that the CIA relied on the discredited Steele dossier in drafting the post-election Intelligence Community Assessment.”

When internal CIA reviews, later declassified by former Director John Ratcliffe, indicate a conflicting story, Brennan’s assertions start to resemble a carefully constructed sidestep rather than a transparent account of events.

Respecting due process is non-negotiable, yet one can’t help but wonder how frequently those in high positions rely on their former titles as a shield against accountability, while the average citizen would face immediate and severe scrutiny for comparable actions.