Ketanji Brown Jackson sparks firestorm with controversial comments on transgender case

Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson just opened her mouth again, and what came out of it was so insane that Jackson might need to be DISQUALIFIED from serving on the nation's highest court.

Brown Jackson just upset much of America with her comparison of "a Tennessee law banning gender transitions for minors to past laws banning interracial marriage," according to Fox News.

According to Fox News:

Jackson and the other justices heard over two hours of oral arguments during the U.S. v. Skrmetti case, which involves the constitutionality of state laws banning gender transition medical procedures for minors. U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that state laws have the effect of "sex discrimination," since the minor's gender is key when determining specific medical treatments for those seeking to transition.

After Prelogar's remarks, Brown Jackson said that she saw a "parallel" between U.S. v. Skrmetti and the landmark Loving v. Virginia case in 1967.

"Interesting to me that you mentioned precedent, because some of these questions about sort of who decides and the concerns and legislative prerogatives, etc., sound very familiar to me," Ketanji Brown Jackson said. "They sound in the same kinds of arguments that were made back in the day—50s, 60s—with respect to racial classifications and inconsistencies. I'm thinking in particular about Loving v. Virginia, and I'm wondering whether you thought about the parallels, because I see one as to how this statute operates and how the anti-miscegenation statutes in Virginia operated."

Do you think the liberal Supreme Court justice has a point, or has she really gone off the deep end?