CBS host weighs in on Trump's request to change Smithsonian's American history narrative

The directive from President Donald Trump urging a review of the Smithsonian Institution's historical exhibits has reignited tensions over how American history should be portrayed.

According to Fox News, the President's call for a narrative reemphasizing American success has met with both support and opposition.

President Trump's directive, issued by the White House on August 12, seeks a shift in the Smithsonian's portrayal of history. The aim is to celebrate the nation's achievements rather than concentrate on its past sins. This instruction aligns with the plans for the 250th anniversary of the United States, scheduled for next year.

CBS Segment Captures Context and Debate

During a segment on "CBS Mornings," Tony Dokoupil resonated with aspects of Trump's critique. Dokoupil argued for a balanced approach, asserting that the country's past should be neither idealized nor despised. He supported the notion of aligning the Smithsonian's exhibits with its mission: to create a shared history with hope for the future.

Dokoupil highlighted the question of whether the world has improved thanks to America's existence. In his perspective, the answer is affirmatively yes, indicating that visitors should leave the Smithsonian with a positive impression.

In contrast, co-host Vladimir Duthiers warned against oversimplifying history. Gayle King echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that what Trump describes as "woke" presentations merely reflect the country's full story.

Reactions to Trump's Directives

President Trump criticized the museums for focusing on the negatives, such as slavery and underachievements. He accused them of neglecting stories of success and potential. In his view, existing exhibits in Washington and beyond are part of a "woke" agenda, failing to emphasize the country's bright future.

Trump's statements also emphasized his concern over academic institutions. He plans to replicate the review process applied to colleges and universities within the museums. He claims this approach has made significant advancements in correcting perceived imbalances.

Amidst these measures, Trump highlights the necessity for his legal team to enact changes at the Smithsonian. He maintains that this shift will promote a more balanced narrative that emphasizes American accomplishments.

Responses from the CBS Panel

While Dokoupil agrees with adjusting emphasis toward achievements, he acknowledges that America's history requires context. He believes the Smithsonian should foster hope by showing the positive impact of America and its people on the world.

Gayle King concurs with Duthiers' cautionary stance about possibly sanitizing history. She disagrees with Trump's characterization of current exhibits and considers the portrayal of historical faults as merely comprehensive history. In her view, accounts of historical injustices are integral to understanding the nation's journey.

In the ongoing debate, CBS's Dokoupil reiterated that a balanced portrayal helps forge a common history. He appreciates when narratives promoting hope can lead communities towards unity. This aspect aligns with Trump's call for a perspective that celebrates American success.

Future Steps and Potential Implications

As the Smithsonian faces potential alterations, it remains to be seen how the upcoming changes will affect its displays. While Trump presses for a pivot toward celebrating the nation's successes, others continue to advocate for preserving a nuanced understanding of history.

The debate reflects broader national discussions on how to approach historical narratives without ignoring past mistakes. As both sides express their opinions, the outcome at the Smithsonian may have lasting effects on how history is presented across museums in the United States.

The directive comes at a time when society is determining how to address history's intricacies in educational and cultural institutions. As these discussions unfold, the Smithsonian will face scrutiny as it decides how to comply with the President's vision.