Biden-era energy loans canceled by DOE, watchdog cites official ties
In a stunning move, the Department of Energy (DOE) has axed over $83 billion in loans and commitments tied to what’s been dubbed the “Green New Scam” from the Biden administration’s tenure.
The DOE announced the elimination of these funds, previously managed through the Loans Programs Office (LPO), now renamed the Office of Energy Dominancy Financing. A watchdog group, Democracy Restored, has raised alarms over the Biden administration’s rapid disbursement of billions to environmental nonprofits after June 27, 2024, alongside concerns about high-level officials moving between government roles and grant recipients. Data from USASpending.gov shows over $600 million obligated to such groups since July 1, 2024, dropping to $246 million after November 5, 2024.
Critics are sounding the alarm over what appears to be a blatant misuse of taxpayer dollars and a troubling “revolving door” between federal agencies and the very organizations they funded. This isn’t just bureaucratic shuffling; it’s a pattern that demands scrutiny. Let’s unpack how the Biden team’s final months fueled this controversy.
Unpacking the Biden Funding Frenzy
After June 27, 2024, following a key debate, the Biden administration began funneling massive sums to climate-focused groups like Alliance for Sustainable Energy, Climate United Fund, and Nature Conservancy. Democracy Restored’s director, Houston Keene, didn’t mince words on the timing and ethics of these payouts. He told Just the News, “I think the money being shoveled out after President Biden’s debate and the apparent revolving door of appointees going to recipients of these federal funds raises many questions about the timing of the money, the impact of special interests in the Biden administration and the general ethics surrounding this behavior.”
Energy Secretary Chris Wright testified that the LPO issued about $40 billion in loans over 15 years, only to see that figure balloon to $100 billion in the Biden administration’s last 76 days. Rushed agreements, Wright noted, often lacked standard DOE clauses. This isn’t stewardship; it’s a fire sale of public funds to ideological allies, as Just The News reports.
Take the World Resources Institute (WRI), which snagged a $1 million DOE grant in August 2024 for school bus electrification projects. Two former DOE heavyweights, Jigar Shah and Jennifer Wilcox, now hold senior fellow positions there. Shah, ex-director of the LPO, also has past ties to loan recipient Plug Power, though he insists he never directly handled their May 2024 loan.
Revolving Doors and Ethical Concerns
Then there’s the broader pattern of officials hopping from government to grantee roles. Renee Stone, once a NOAA leader, now serves at the Audubon Society, which pocketed nearly $4 million in Biden-era grants. Monica Medina, another NOAA alum, landed at Conservation International, recipient of a $9 million grant in 2023.
Chetan Hebbale, a former White House policy advisor, moved to The Nature Conservancy, which scored over $6 million under Biden. Susan Ruffo, previously with Oceans Conservancy, later worked at NOAA while her old outfit received nearly $6 million. These cozy relationships aren’t just eyebrow-raising; they’re a flashing red light.
Houston Keene put it bluntly, saying these ties don’t “pass the smell test” and need a closer look. An Inspector General audit in December found 20% of reviewed LPO employees had potential conflicts of interest. If that doesn’t scream for accountability, what does?
Trump Administration Pushes Back Hard
The Trump administration isn’t sitting idle, actively rolling back Biden’s hurried funding and offshore wind ambitions, like the 30-gigawatt goal now under fire. Oceans Conservancy, a loud cheerleader for Biden’s wind projects, not only got federal cash but also support from developer Orsted. This kind of overlap fuels suspicion of agenda-driven handouts.
Democracy Restored’s data shows federal law restricts certain post-employment actions for senior officials but doesn’t bar them from taking jobs with grant recipients. Still, the optics are terrible, and there’s no evidence these individuals directly worked on the grants—though that hardly quells the unease. Keene’s call for deeper investigation is spot-on.
Under Biden, if your group echoed the administration’s eco-dogma, a check seemed guaranteed. Taxpayers, meanwhile, were left footing the bill for what looks like political favoritism. This isn’t governance; it’s a transactional game.
What’s Next for Taxpayer Accountability?
The DOE’s cancellation of $83 billion in questionable loans signals the Trump team’s intent to clean house. But reversing the damage isn’t just about slashing funds; it’s about restoring trust in how public money is handled. Every rushed dollar and revolving-door hire chips away at that trust.
Looking ahead, conservatives will likely demand tighter oversight of agency funding and stricter rules on post-office gigs. The Biden administration’s last-minute largesse could become a rallying cry for reforming how federal grants are doled out. No one wants to see hard-earned tax dollars funneled to ideological pet projects.
Ultimately, this saga is a stark reminder of why vigilance matters. The “Green New Scam” loans may be gone, but the stench of cronyism lingers. Let’s hope the push for accountability doesn’t fade as quickly as those obligations did after November 5, 2024.
