Arizona's Gubernatorial Election Results Called into Question in Arizona Supreme Court Case

 July 17, 2023

Former Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has decided to go to battle with Arizona's Supreme Court over the election results in her race. Lake's appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court alleges that at least 8,000 unreadable ballots were incorrectly read, casting doubt on the accuracy of the election outcome. The case has drawn attention to potential issues with ballot counting and raises concerns about the integrity of the electoral process in Arizona.

Lake's appeal, filed at the end of last week, focuses on the problem of unreadable ballots that were not duplicated or counted. A ballot-on-demand printer investigation report by former Chief Justice McGregor revealed a technical error during the printing process, resulting in misconfigured ballots.

According to the appeal, Lake's legal team argues that the "error" in question could only have resulted from malware or remote access, resulting in thousands of misconfigured ballots that were neither duplicated nor counted. These allegations raise concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the election and underscore the importance of thoroughly investigating the issue.

Moving the Case to Another Court Division

In an unexpected turn of events, Lake announced that her election case has been transferred to another court division. The decision to move the case has raised questions among both supporters and critics, introducing additional complexities to the legal proceedings.

The transfer was reportedly based on an Arizona law that allows the Phoenix Appeals Court to randomly send cases to Tucson in order to manage its workload. However, concerns have been voiced regarding the jurisdiction of the new court, especially considering its coverage of Pima County, known as the most politically left-leaning part of the state.

The move of the case to a different court division has introduced an element of uncertainty and has sparked discussions about the fairness and transparency of the judicial process. Doubts have been raised regarding the impartiality of the court and the potential implications of its jurisdiction on the final ruling. The fairness of the proceedings is crucial for upholding public trust in the electoral system and ensuring the principles of democracy are preserved.

An Unwavering Pursuit of Justice

Despite the challenges faced in her legal battle, Lake remains steadfast in her pursuit of justice. She has expressed her readiness to take her election lawsuit all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. Lake firmly believes that her case carries significant importance in bringing about much-needed reform in the electoral process and is determined to see it through.

Undeterred by the absence of a favorable ruling thus far, she maintains her conviction that the case has a strong foundation built on truth and substantial evidence.

"This is, I believe, our best hope to get reform in our elections: my case," Lake affirmed. "I believe it's the greatest election case. We have the truth on our side. We have tons of evidence. Yes, we haven't had a judge rule in our favor. But it takes a lot of courage to make the right ruling on this case."

Lake's unwavering commitment to her election case has gained admiration from her supporters, as it demonstrates her determination to protect democratic principles and ensure the accuracy and fairness of elections.

Implications for Election Integrity and the Political Landscape

The outcome of Lake's appeal and the subsequent legal proceedings will have far-reaching implications for election integrity and the political landscape in Arizona. The allegations surrounding unreadable and misconfigured ballots cast doubt on the accuracy of the vote count and raise concerns about the legitimacy of the entire election. If substantiated, these allegations could undermine public confidence in the electoral process and call for a reevaluation of existing protocols.

Furthermore, Lake's case sheds light on broader issues within the electoral system. It brings attention to voting machine errors that affected numerous Republican voters on Election Day in Maricopa County. With errors occurring in over 60% of the voting centers, accusations of voter disenfranchisement have been made. Additionally, the case highlights problems related to the signature verification process for mail-in ballots, further fueling ongoing debates on election integrity.

Looking ahead, Lake's legal battle and her unwavering determination to fight for election reform have fueled speculation about her political future. Reports indicate that she is contemplating a run for the United States Senate, with an expected announcement of her bid in the fall. Regardless of the outcome of her election lawsuit, Lake's commitment to effecting change and safeguarding the democratic process remains resolute.

The appeal highlights the need to examine the reliability of the ballot-printing system and its impact on the election's outcome. To read the full appeal, click [here](

Essential Takeaways:

- Former Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, contesting the election results in her race.
- The appeal alleges that at least 8,000 unreadable ballots were incorrectly read, raising concerns about the accuracy of the election outcome.
- The case has been transferred to another court division, adding complexity to the legal proceedings and prompting discussions about the fairness of the judicial process.
- Lake is determined to pursue her election lawsuit, and she is prepared to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
- The case highlights broader issues surrounding election integrity, including voting machine errors and problems with the verification of mail-in ballot signatures.
- The outcome of the appeal will have significant implications for election integrity and may impact the political landscape in Arizona.

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter to raise awareness about the ongoing legal battle and the importance of upholding election integrity.