Former Biden Doctor Refuses to Answer Health Questions

 July 10, 2025

The former doctor to Joe Biden, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, recently opted to plead the Fifth Amendment during a deposition with the House Oversight Committee. This decision has generated substantial speculation and debate about Biden’s health and its potential concealment.

Dr. O’Connor, facing allegations of covering up Biden’s health issues, triggered further investigations after remaining silent on questions of advanced prostate cancer and cognitive abilities, New York Post reported.

Wednesday's deposition ignited controversy as Dr. O’Connor chose to remain silent rather than answer inquiries about former President Joe Biden's health. The committee, led by Chairman James Comer, views O’Connor's actions as potentially part of a cover-up concerning Biden's alleged prostate cancer and cognitive decline.

Allegations of Concealment and Compliance

The episode has placed the spotlight squarely on the House Oversight Committee, tasked with uncovering the truth behind these serious allegations. A video of the deposition, disseminated by the committee on X, raised pointed questions about what might be concealed.

Dr. Jeffrey Kuhlman, who served under former President Obama, highlighted that O’Connor could have answered certain questions without treading on the boundaries of doctor-patient privilege. His insights bolster the notion that Dr. O’Connor’s choice of silence might not solely be for confidentiality.

Representative Ronny Jackson has been vocal in his criticism of Dr. O’Connor’s conduct, suggesting that his reluctance to answer could imply potential wrongdoing. Jackson’s strong statements imply that O’Connor might be defending his own actions instead of safeguarding Biden’s privacy.

Reactions and Further Investigations

Defenders of Dr. O’Connor, like Rep. Jasmine Crockett, argue that his legal strategy aligns with standard procedures to shield patient information. She emphasized the prudence of acting on legal advice, painting his decision as one grounded in professionalism and diligence.

Several former Biden administration officials expressed that Dr. O’Connor’s loyalty was unsurprising. His stance is seen as a reflection of steadfast allegiance to the former president, aligning with past observations of his character and principles.

The incident has been further complicated by references from Chairman Comer to the book “Original Sin.” The publication alleges senior advisers were the real decision-makers during Biden’s tenure, adding another layer to the ongoing investigation.

Interviews with Past Aides and Future Actions

To delve deeper into these claims, interviews with former aides Ashley Williams, Annie Tomasini, and others are in progress. These efforts aim to shed light on the inner workings and decisions made during Biden's administration.

Chairman Comer has been ardent in his quest to scrutinize further, asserting that the investigation should address the broader concerns about the handling and portrayal of the president’s health condition.

The Trump administration’s choice not to assert executive privilege over O’Connor’s testimony also fuels the narrative of transparency demands. Past aides testifying without privilege positions this instance as potentially unique.

Conclusion and Broader Implications

The expected inquiry into whether an autopen was used for executive actions during Biden’s time in office highlights the depth and breadth of the investigation. Comer made it clear that these are just part of a larger probe into alleged improprieties.

The responses, ranging from forceful allegations of misconduct to defenses of procedural correctness, illustrate the complexities involved in balancing transparency with legal rights and confidentiality expectations in such high-profile cases.

Ultimately, the unfolding hearings and testimonies are likely to reveal more about the intricate dynamics between medical professionals and the accountability structures within U.S. political institutions. Only time will tell what truths might emerge from this wide-ranging inquiry.