Anthony Bernal refuses to testify amid controversy

Amid an unfolding political drama, Anthony Bernal, a former advisor to Jill Biden, has declined to testify before the House Oversight Committee.

According to Fox News, the committee is probing allegations involving the concealment of President Joe Biden’s cognitive issues and unauthorized utilization of autopen for executive orders. Despite a waiver of executive privilege by the White House, Bernal's refusal could trigger a subpoena from committee chair James Comer.

Originally slated to provide a transcribed interview on June 26, 2025, Bernal is facing pressure over his choice to sidestep the proceedings.

Accusations and Potential Subpoena Actions Emerge

Committee Chair James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, has leveled accusations at Bernal, asserting that he is evading transparency. Comer has made it clear that if Bernal continues to avoid providing his testimony, a subpoena will be forthcoming.

Moreover, the White House has eliminated any potential for hiding behind executive privilege in this case. This decision was communicated in letters that have come into the possession of Fox News Digital.

According to these documents, individuals associated with the case cannot use their former roles in the White House as a legal shield.

White House Waives Executive Privilege

In a letter, Gary Lawkowski, Deputy Counsel to the President, emphasized that former President Trump's decision to waive executive privilege stands firm.

"In light of the unique and extraordinary nature of the matters under investigation," Lawkowski stated, "President Trump has determined that an assertion of executive privilege is not in the national interest."

The investigation by the committee seeks to determine whether senior aides to President Biden actively played roles in masking concerns about his mental capabilities.

Tanden's Testimony Raises Questions

Adding another dimension to the investigation, former Staff Secretary Neera Tanden testified regarding her limited interactions with President Biden.

Her statements during testimony have led to further inquiries about the individuals making pivotal decisions in the administration amid concerns regarding the President's acuity.

Chair James Comer commented on her testimony, affirming the importance of discovering who was "really calling the shots" within the Biden administration.

Bernal Retracts After Executive Privilege Waiver

Anthony Bernal's legal representation quickly retracted his willingness to provide an interview following the waiver of executive privilege by the White House.

This retraction stands as a notable pivot in his stance towards cooperation with the committee.

However, Comer is unwavering in his determination, previously having subpoenaed Bernal and others to testify during the last congressional session.

History of Alleged Obstruction

The last Congress encountered alleged resistance from the White House, which purportedly obstructed the provision of access to key aides for the investigation.

James Comer strongly criticized Bernal's current stance, emphasizing that with no privilege remaining, Bernal is evading transparency. "With no privilege left to hide behind, Mr. Bernal is now running scared," Comer remarked.

As the situation stands, the potential for subpoena looms large over Bernal, reinforcing the committee's commitment to uncovering the full scope of the issue.

Unveiling the Truth for the Public

The committee maintains its stance that the American public deserves clarity and accountability regarding the matters at hand.

Comer concluded by stressing the committee's resolve, stating that obstruction will not be tolerated, and the pursuit of truth remains paramount.

As the investigation unfolds, Bernal’s choice to refuse testimony is under sharp scrutiny, underscoring the complex interplay between privilege waivers and transparency expectations.